Asus Q500A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Q500A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q500A
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 152
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 404
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 107B) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 313 299 301 304 296 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 482
Write 418
Mixed 419
SusWrite 304
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 28.7
110% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 78.7
108% 205 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 122%
WD My Passport 1TB
271GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 72.1
Write 74.4
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 56.5
82% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 750GB
304GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 62 62 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 88.1
Write 84.6
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 62.3
92% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q500A Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q500A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback