| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130712 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | May 07 '21 at 11:25 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | LVA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.1%
Very good
|
70% 121 Pts
|
43% 324 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
49.2%
Average
|
48% 72.9 fps
|
51% 63.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 226 229 228 230 233 MB/s
|
63.7%
Good
|
51% 227 MB/s
|
103% 34.5 MB/s
|
121% 169 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
307GB free
Firmware: AM001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 85 82 84 84 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
50% 69.3 MB/s
|
89% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-185.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-185.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.2%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
55% 73.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 396 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 46x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |