Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
64% 127 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 447
58% 438 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2712) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 356 360 362 360 361 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 989
Mixed 476
SusWrite 394
178% 806 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 45.5
197% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 453
426% 646 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 171%
Great: 180%
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
135GB free
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 456 222 149 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 441
Mixed 373
SusWrite 261
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 41.8
161% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 304
223% 289 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
754GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 174 183 183 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 130
Write 161
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 176
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
270GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 120 122 124 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 68.7
Write 119
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 119
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54%
Great: 95%
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 256GB
29GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 139 153 158 156 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 179
Mixed 134
SusWrite 152
218% 164 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 14.5
1,384% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 17.5
1,950% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 140%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G Avant W641GU42J7240NC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $629
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback