Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory105.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 57.4
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 177
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 714
63% 536 Pts
64-Core 1,794
111% 1,794 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 136
Parallax 125
96% 126 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 128
Splatting 116
94% 114 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 446
Mixed 386
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 43.6
135% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 342
255% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-1TM8S 1TB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,213
Write 945
Mixed 912
227% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 50.9
179% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 354
344% 550 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 184%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
29GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 58 56 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 188
Write 62.8
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 56
22% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 25.1
93% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 78.7
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 70.3
52% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-1TM8S 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,197
Write 967
Mixed 916
228% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 54.1
192% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 504
416% 601 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 34.2
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 3.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback