Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 13:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 375
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 31
24% 30.5 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 20
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T87A101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 120 137 136 136 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 413
Write 386
Mixed 296
SusWrite 134
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 36.3
96% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 274
198% 263 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
743GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 110
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 0443 RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback