Asus Q500A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Q500A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q500A
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 13:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 145
56% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 359
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 107B) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.9
5% 3.27 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 306 301 301 301 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 461
Write 402
Mixed 368
SusWrite 302
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 23.6
90% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 74.3
87% 154 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73%
Great: 128%
WD My Passport 1TB
273GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 53.5
77% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 750GB
308GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 78
Mixed 45
SusWrite 74.9
92% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q500A Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q500A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback