Asus K8N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K8N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 'K8N'
Memory1.7 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 11:55
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35
Socket 754, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19% Very poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 21.8
19% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 23.3
8-Core 24.8
3% 24 Pts
64-Core 25.3
2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON 9600
Device(17AF 200F) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.4
1% 0.55 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 12 46 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 49.1
Write 55.1
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 38.5
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 1.1
MC Mixed 1.1
3% 1.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback