Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210126
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 829
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1773 1754 1544 1445 1279 1236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,627
Write 1,483
Mixed 694
SusWrite 1,505
350% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 77
265% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,091
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 984
740% 992 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 323%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P32NC8W1-BCFS AM2P32NC4U1-BD8S 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback