Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration	516 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 74.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 93% 175 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1150 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 2,139 132% 2,139 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Asus(1043 0577) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.8% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 127 Parallax 170 90% 136 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 121 Splatting 87.9 84% 105 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 433 435 415 415 409 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1303 Write 1457 Mixed 1,338 SusWrite 555 262% 1,163 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 193 4K Mixed 79.3 284% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,233 DQ Write 813 DQ Mixed 957 732% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 253%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 121GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 299 297 297 298 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Read 458 Write 415 Mixed 367 SusWrite 311 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 11.7 39% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 157 129% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 124%
Samsung MZYTE256 256GB 238GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 256 256 256 256 255 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	Read 369 Write 262 Mixed 198 SusWrite 256 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 12.2 46% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 53.4 78% 141 MB/s

WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 149 148 150 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 157 Write 154 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 148 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 112GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 145 143 145 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 163 Write 155 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 144 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 54GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 89 88 144 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 103 Write 89.8 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 138 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 101%
Asmedia ASMT105 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 110GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 56 56 57 55 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 31 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 55.5 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 121% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 35GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 75.5 Write 76 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 69.7 47% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 84%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 13GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 59 100 80 79 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 93.7 Write 67 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 77.1 93% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0741 1TB 1,389 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 33GB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 78 77 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 91.2 Write 93 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 77.6 105% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 44%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 112GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 66 62 62 62 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 48 Write 67.5 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 64.3 93% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.3 114% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 26GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 65.3 Write 66.4 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 63.3 75% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA HDWA130 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 17GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 4 4 4 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 28.4 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 3.9 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 11GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 4 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.5% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 20 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 4 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.5% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 47GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3 3.1 3.2 4.7 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 3GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 4 4 3.9 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.76% Terrible	Read 31.3 Write 27.4 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 3.9 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.7 MB/s

TOSHIBA HDWA130 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 27GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 3.9 4 4 3.9 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 3.9 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 8GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 4 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 26.4 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 3.9 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 66% 0.73 MB/s

WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 36GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 15 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 27GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 28.8 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 15.9 31% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 24GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 4 3.9 3.9 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	Read 30.1 Write 18.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 3.9 24% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB 8,162 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 28.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 24.3 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,635x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $190Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,232x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	859x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	826x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	706x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	625x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	224x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $740

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16