Acer Aspire A715-71G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A715-71G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Charmeleon_KLS
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 194
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 359
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 119B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.8
5% 13.8 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 540
Write 523
Mixed 551
120% 538 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 44.6
162% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 292
246% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
29GB free
Firmware: AM002J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.9
Write 81.4
Mixed 30.7
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A715-71G Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-71G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback