TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo Sabine

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo Sabine  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torpedo
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 20:58
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3420M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 58.8
36% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 97.7
8-Core 100
13% 98.9 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 42.1%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Legend(17AA 3970) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.6
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.44%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 182 67 25 29 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 168
Write 211
Mixed 190
SusWrite 88
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 10.3
55% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 66.1
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 15.7
34% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 32.5%
 Great: 81%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
875GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 10.6
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 10.3
11% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 10.3%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F133 RMT3020EC58E9F133 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Sabine Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Sabine

CPU
A6-3400M APUAMDBench 35%, 3,654 samples8x
A4-3300M APUAMD  $90Bench 33%, 1,991 samples6x
A8-3520M APUAMD  $60Bench 38%, 1,349 samples4x
GPU
Radeon HD 6520GAMDBench 2%, 8,067 samples8x
Radeon HD 6480GAMDBench 2%, 5,005 samples6x
Radeon HD 6620GAMDBench 3%, 3,311 samples5x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples1x
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata  $66Bench 104%, 31,280 samples1x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples1x
RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples2x
RMT3010EC58E8F133 RMT3020EC58E9F133 6GBUnknownBench 27%, 25 samples2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback