Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	90% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 280 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 874 89% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,056 65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 96.3 Reflection 108 Parallax 146 78% 117 fps	MRender 89.8 Gravity 104 Splatting 75.7 72% 90 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 883GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 1707 1629 1537 1527 1515 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	340% Outstanding	Read 2,372 Write 1,682 Mixed 1,567 SusWrite 1,601 404% 1,805 MB/s	4K Read 69.2 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 93.7 308% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,294 DQ Write 1,006 DQ Mixed 1114 843% 1138 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 340% Great: 410%
Patriot Memory 64GB 1,048 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 59GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 37 39 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 31.3 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 37.6 41% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 44% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 34.7 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 35.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	875x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	839x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $455Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	574x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	518x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $973

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16