Asus X556UQK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X556UQK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556UQK
Memory2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 09:03
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 99.7
63% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 200
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Asus(1043 1490) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8165
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 15
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.1 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 80 131 16 14 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 186
Write 84.1
Mixed 145
SusWrite 73.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 32
114% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 16.9
33% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
411GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 103 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 61.4
Write 126
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 101
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 13%
Mass Storage Device 268GB
89GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.6
1% 0.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD1 12GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X556UQK Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556UQK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback