HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201123
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 03 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 740 77% 621 Pts	64-Core 743 46% 743 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.93 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Lighting 85.7 Reflection 84.3 Parallax 69.1 70% 79.7 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 67.6 56% 69 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2175 2038 1755 1609 1229 1697 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 1,022 Write 1,579 Mixed 806 SusWrite 1,750 293% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 54.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 74.1 250% 88.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,476 DQ Write 1,290 DQ Mixed 1,382 1,036% 1383 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 393%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 179 180 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 169 Mixed 110 SusWrite 180 123% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U6S8ME-8X 2x8GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 27.2 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 27.6 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,386x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,014x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	715x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,331x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	714x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,400x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,229x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	295x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,899x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	779x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	453x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16