Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 935
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,433
89% 1,433 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 218
Parallax 486
194% 314 fps
MRender 388
Gravity 193
Splatting 277
231% 286 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 186%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 99 137 106 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1,347
Mixed 1028
SusWrite 230
229% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 79.9
276% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 463
422% 637 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 192%
Great: 255%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
121GB free
Firmware: UF22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 113 59 56 88 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 346
Write 292
Mixed 256
SusWrite 102
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 6
28% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 48.4
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 13.8
31% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 41%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
528GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 167 109 113 133 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 92.8
Write 147
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 135
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback