Lenovo F0AV0016GE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo F0AV0016GE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140630
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 09:55
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 130
53% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 A260 Dual Graphics
Legend(17AA 368F) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver:
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 12.6
0% 6.73 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 135 110 119 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 149
Write 151
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 128
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
WDC WD12 00UE-22KVT0 120GB
59GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 25 27 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 27.3
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 28.2
36% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback