Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 11 '17 at 13:13
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 107
54% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 285
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
783GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 91
Mixed 25.3
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.34
94% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 34
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.48
94% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
167GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 35.2
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.34
92% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 60%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
102GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 40
Write 55.4
Mixed 43.5
35% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 32%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
277GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 28.8
Mixed 13.3
29% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.32
42% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
Seagate External Drive 320GB
81GB free, PID 0503
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 21.9
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.39
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback