Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 90.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 891 88% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	24.7% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 35.9 Parallax 28.2 26% 31.9 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 26.1 23% 28 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 470 469 391 214 212 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 443 Mixed 404 SusWrite 370 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 57.2 192% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 264 221% 321 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 128%
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 223GB free Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 475 473 348 204 207 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 421 Mixed 410 SusWrite 363 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 58.3 198% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 132 158% 276 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 128%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 3.5TB free Firmware: VLGNW460 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 224 221 223 218 227 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 129 Mixed 101 SusWrite 222 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.6 341% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D4-59DN421SEV-17 4x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 25.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 25.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	457x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	378x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $874

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16