Biostar TP45D2-A7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP45D2-A7  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 97
48% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Sky 500
AMD(1002 0420) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1235 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 15.11
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 46.5
29% 40.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 34
Splatting 26.6
25% 31 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 185 190 191 159 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 212
Write 196
Mixed 184
SusWrite 181
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 18.5
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 19
19% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP45D2-A7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TP45D2-A7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback