HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 07:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 135
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 431
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W8100
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 824 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 54.5
28% 48.8 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 44
Splatting 35.1
34% 43.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,347
Write 652
Mixed 606
190% 868 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 38.9
132% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 378
270% 351 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 243%
Maxtor STM310003 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: MX15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 104 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 42.3
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 104
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 64%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
895GB free
Firmware: AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 104 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.8
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 104
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 37.3
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback