HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory16.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 581
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.7
16% 19 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 389 375 368 357 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 416
Write 321
Mixed 341
SusWrite 361
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 30.2
116% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 147
129% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 129%
Hua722010cla330 00W1143 00W1447IBM 1TB
852GB free
Firmware: A3PH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 140 140 132 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 137
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 20GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback