Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '17 at 01:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 46.9
31% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 83.4
8-Core 202
16% 143 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 3.62
2% 5.01 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128M6M 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 471
Write 316
Mixed 374
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 16.2
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 90.7
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 35.1
38% 65 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
160GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 57.8
44% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G Micron 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback