Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,593 User benchmarks, average bench 21% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Memory 10.7 1-Core 19 2-Core 26.4 11% 18.7 Pts	4-Core 28.9 8-Core 35.4 4% 32.2 Pts	64-Core 35.2 2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 248 248 234 272 258 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 261 Write 278 Mixed 258 SusWrite 252 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 12 46% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 87 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 46.2 44% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Snap 16GB 526 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 55a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 8.1 8.9 11 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 11.2 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 9.9 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GLSTU160N02 2x8GB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 397 10% 397 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-2500 APUAMDBench 21%, 2,593 samples	3x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16