Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW199
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5472 256 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	40% Average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 43 2-Core 85.8 36% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 316 29% 243 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 9.2 Parallax 2 4% 5.4 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 76 81 83 82 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.3% Below average	Read 119 Write 106 Mixed 102 SusWrite 79.7 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 17.7 66% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 33.6 24% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 178GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 78 82 83 82 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 123 Write 126 Mixed 123 SusWrite 80.5 26% 113 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 20.6 78% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.8 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 42.7 44% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 419 417 406 399 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 594 Write 605 Mixed 607 SusWrite 411 125% 554 MB/s	4K Read 60.1 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 72.3 236% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 427 DQ Mixed 666 407% 432 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 280%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 75 79 82 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 65 SusWrite 77.5 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 379GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 79 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 94 Write 83.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 77.6 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 817GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 147 147 148 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 145 Write 147 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 148 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 139 141 137 141 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 123 Write 125 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 138 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	49x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	18x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16