Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 116
46% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 193
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 50 50 50 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 349
Write 349
Mixed 295
SusWrite 74.6
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 34.9
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
35% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
728GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 79.5
Write 79.1
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 82.4
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2H Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback