HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84F8
Memory11.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 189
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 356
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84F8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 324
Mixed 320
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 22.4
84% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 303
229% 307 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 107 112 115 114 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 58.5
Write 94.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 112
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback