Avita NS14A6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAvita NS14A6  (all builds)
MotherboardAVITA 6Q14DA9M85
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 04:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9400 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 38.3
26% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 57.8
8-Core 55.4
8% 56.6 Pts
64-Core 46.8
3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Device(1DC2 2208) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 344 329 368 338 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 408
Write 372
Mixed 370
SusWrite 314
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 29.9
104% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 130
100% 136 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 3 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS14A6 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Avita NS14A6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback