Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 01:22
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,147
103% 871 Pts
64-Core 2,176
135% 2,176 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
MSI(1462 3897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 323
Parallax 283
231% 296 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 243
Splatting 184
195% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32A0T54B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2672
Write 1,945
Mixed 1319
437% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 53.3
215% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 374
297% 407 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
927GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 181 183 183 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 180
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 182
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 45.3
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback