Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 21:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 76.9
38% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
MSI(1462 2022) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 19 40 69 80 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 23.4
Write 29
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 54.3
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST9640322AS 640GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 53.6
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 57.1
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 48%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
438GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 67 70 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 64
Write 71.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 68.8
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5471-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback