Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 19:15
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 72 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 707 68% 562 Pts	64-Core 864 54% 864 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 60.1 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 83.4 49% 68.1 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 63.8 Splatting 45.4 45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 4.8 112 105 4.8 163 MB/s Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.3% Good	Read 225 Write 16.5 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 84.1 20% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 40.6 139% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 117 92% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 85%
Kingston SA400S37120G 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 163GB free Firmware: S3501103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 449 450 452 453 339 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 509 Write 439 Mixed 413 SusWrite 431 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 30.2 134% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 95.2 114% 193 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB 5,242 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 14.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	23x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	7x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	5x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GBPNYBench 82%, 961 samples	3x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,943 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16