Acer Aspire A515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Calla_RN
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 10:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 85
2-Core 174
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 968
92% 764 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1461) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.40
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 24.3
6% 14.1 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 18
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 892 875 927 463 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 845
Mixed 732
SusWrite 699
182% 810 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 45.7
148% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 266
320% 552 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 158%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-44 Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback