Asus X450JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X450JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450JF
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 119
38% 239 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 745M
Asus(1043 11ED) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8
Parallax 10.2
7% 9.07 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 12
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 480GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 293 316 329 73 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 433
Write 354
Mixed 333
SusWrite 226
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 16.3
82% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 0.4
61% 140 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 86%
UT163 USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5
8% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450JF Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback