Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 348
49% 361 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 14.2 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS128GD9MND-551 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20400A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 165 173 183 187 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 839
Write 208
Mixed 272
SusWrite 170
81% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 28.9
116% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 277
210% 287 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 105 112 105 115 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 128
Mixed 54
SusWrite 106
69% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback