Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 47 1-Core 117 2-Core 236 69% 133 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 486 62% 469 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 52.3 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 74.2 43% 62 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 57.2 Splatting 43.8 43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
APS-SL3N-120 120GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 37 27 30 33 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 445 Write 368 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 73.8 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.2 20% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 91GB free Firmware: GR2OA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 88.5 Write 88.5 Mixed 33 SusWrite 88.1 54% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905678-005.A00G 1x8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	653x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	170x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	129x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16