Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110614
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 04:34
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 117
53% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 262
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 318 348 215 309 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 437
Write 356
Mixed 312
SusWrite 273
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 22.4
91% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 219
179% 255 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
115GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 57 57 57 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 50.9
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 55.7
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
43GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 28 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 26.2
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback