Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 178 60% 107 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 235 42% 294 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 470.25 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.33 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 41 27 36 36 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 175 Write 167 Mixed 37 SusWrite 36.4 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 11.7 60% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 0 9% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 78%
Seagate ST320DM001 HD322GJ 320GB 590 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 250GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 37 48 32 51 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 138 Write 61 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 42.3 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 82%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 251GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 62 61 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 76.6 Write 49.5 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 60.8 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 47%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 461GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 72 74 74 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 70.5 Write 72.4 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 73.4 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 298GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 21 Mixed 22 SusWrite 11.2 26% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 21%
WDC WD64 00BPVT-60HXZT1 640GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 175GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.3% Very poor	Read 22.6 Write 18.5 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 10.7 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 31%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 890GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 36 37 37 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 39.9 Write 36.3 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 37.1 48% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.8 5.4 5.7 5.6 5.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	Read 20.7 Write 21.8 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 5.6 21% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HD103SM 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.6 6.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.8% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 21.9 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 5.7 23% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.2 156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 25%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 834GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 19.2 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 0 19% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 38%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 360GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22.2 Write 20.5 Mixed 20.7 27% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB 3,888 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	180x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	159x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	81x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16