Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive5.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 08:12
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 67.7
36% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 135
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 8.4 0.4 2.1 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.22% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 10.5
2% 6.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 5.3
13% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 91%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
76GB free
Firmware: VT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 61 61 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 63.3
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 61.2
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 38%
Maxtor 6 L200M0 204GB
63GB free
Firmware: BANC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 60.3
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 62.7
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Intenso Alu Line 32GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.1 7.1 7.4 7.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7
7% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback