Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 36.7 2-Core 73.6 35% 55.5 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 130 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 108A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.47 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC152S37256GG2 256GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.R SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 260 174 253 260 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 65.8 Write 247 Mixed 299 SusWrite 235 49% 212 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 27.2 95% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 148 130% 194 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 1x8GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.1 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	66x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	57x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	31x

SSD
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	11x
CV3-CE256 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 1,018 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	27x
ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 2,224 samples	19x
HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 6,821 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16