Toshiba SATELLITE C850-1CP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C850-1CP  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 104
48% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 148
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 201 205 207 208 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 396
Write 182
Mixed 216
SusWrite 198
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 20.1
79% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 63.9
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 91.2
79% 112 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C850-1CP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C850-1CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback