Supermicro X8SIE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X8SIE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8SIE
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 158
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 372
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 84.3
53% 74.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 45.7
45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC7110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 186 192 191 193 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 190
Write 180
Mixed 149
SusWrite 185
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 21.2
76% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 60
DQ Mixed 30.5
27% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 95%
Apple HDD HDS723020ALA640 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MK0BBA81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 142 142 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 137
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 141
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125R7BFR8C-G7 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8SIE Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X8SIE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback