Compaq-presario KC690AA-ABM SG3209LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCompaq-presario KC690AA-ABM SG3209LA  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Iris8
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 22:32
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon LE-1620
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 31.1
32% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 35.1
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 34.5
2% 34.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.8
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 16
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 46 44 51 53 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 55
Mixed 37
SusWrite 45.1
36% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback