HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191210
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '21 at 19:09
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	85%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 274 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 829 81% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,088 67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.9% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 130 Parallax 120 97% 123 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 125 Splatting 109 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$37 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 493 514 497 471 490 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 791 Write 365 Mixed 507 SusWrite 491 120% 538 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 36.7 151% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 582 DQ Write 561 DQ Mixed 327 313% 490 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 216%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: HP52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 189 191 189 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 140 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 190 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 25.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,260x
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	723x
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	594x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	751x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	361x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	294x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	359x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	173x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $37Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	158x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	401x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	222x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16