Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory250.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 20:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 155
56% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 682
57% 494 Pts
64-Core 2,142
133% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 150 116 134 128 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 356
Write 342
Mixed 322
SusWrite 135
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 11.5
54% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 21.5
73% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 16x16GB
16 of 24 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 19
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback