HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 16:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 160
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 161
17% 138 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 844F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.69
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 35.5
28% 37.9 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 31.2
28% 34 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1440 824 827 824 824 823 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1103
Write 1131
Mixed 1,101
SusWrite 927
240% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 41.9
132% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 206
170% 243 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 154%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback