Toshiba SATELLITE L50t-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50t-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140124
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 15:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 408
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA13) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.2
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61L3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 146 75 64 82 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 392
Write 346
Mixed 338
SusWrite 105
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 37
139% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 138
147% 241 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 139%
Marshal MAL2750SA-T54 750GB
14GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 101 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 97
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 99.7
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50t-A Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50t-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback