Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 04:02
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 973
95% 780 Pts
64-Core 1505
93% 1505 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Nvidia(10DE 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 220
Parallax 236
190% 230 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 210
Splatting 158
160% 201 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 164%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2367 3060 2999 3123 1649 1609 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,802
Write 3071
Mixed 2,912
SusWrite 2,468
635% 2,813 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 103
334% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 1071
807% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 416%
Great: 488%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 870 1TB
802GB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 461 463 418 463 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 430
Write 451
Mixed 426
SusWrite 454
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 30.4
104% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 170
148% 212 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB
400GB free
Firmware: 23000020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 1692 1568 449 484 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,350
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 1,052
372% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 65.7
215% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1089
780% 992 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 267%
Great: 321%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 870 1TB
563GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 438 436 444 440 443 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 467
Mixed 450
SusWrite 438
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 34.8
118% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 186
158% 224 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 94%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 177 178 178 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 173
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 176
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.6
293% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.7
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 36.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback