Lenovo 82GU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82GU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 05:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 924
88% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A47) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 70.5
65% 78.4 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 74.3
66% 81.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 426 426 422 424 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2212
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,374
SusWrite 438
321% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 74
246% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 1,014
735% 955 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 233%
Great: 264%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
175GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 376 102 106 109 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1336
Write 356
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 220
161% 731 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 69.3
240% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 269
342% 600 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 175%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE CT8G4SFRA32A.M16FG 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 76%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82GU Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 82GU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback