Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 01:51
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 133
59% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 326
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS722020K9SA00 FDE 200GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC4LC75A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 27 24 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 19.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 26.3
16% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 37%
Maxtor STM380811AS 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71
Write 70
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 71.9
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
10GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 40.9
Write 35.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 40.9
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 37GB
4266, 33 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback