Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 185
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 529
51% 422 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Sapphire(174B 6265) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.00
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 29.3
17% 25.4 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 24.8
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMS100S360GD 60GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 18 21 21 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 164 158 163 171 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 145
Mixed 72
SusWrite 161
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback