Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 05:30
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 510
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
7.99% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 14.2
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 8.3
7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.99%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pionee APS-SL2 Serise 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 445
Write 366
Mixed 303
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 11.6
79% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 16.7
48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 74%
WD WD2003FYYS-02W0B 2TB
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 100 101 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 89
SusWrite 101
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 148 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 98.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 147
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-DS3H-A Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback